Monday, 28 May 2018

Blow for Vedanta as Tamil Nadu orders permanent closure of Sterlite factory

Tamil Nadu has issued a Government Order (GO) to close Vedanta Group's Sterlite Copper in Thoothukudi. The development comes after 13 persons were killed last week in police firing during protests against the plant.
The GO states that it is brought to the notice of the government that the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board did not renew the Consent to Operate to Vedanta Ltd's copper smelter plant at Thoothukudi in its order dated April 9, 2018. Subsequently, on May 23, 2018 Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board has also issued directions for closure and disconnection of power supply to the unit.

"Under sections, 18(1)(b) of the Water Act, 1974 in the larger public interest, the Government endorse the closure direction of the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board and also direct the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board to seal the unit and close the plant permanently," said in the Order.
ALSO READ: Anti-Sterlite: SC refuses to give urgent hearing
While welcoming the GO's, protestors said that they needed cabinet decision on this or company would move court to get a stay. They also want the Centre to take a similar stand.
Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Edappadi K Palaniswami said last Thursday that the state government was taking all steps legally to permanently close down Sterlite Copper. Earlier the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board (TNPCB) ordered the closure of the Sterlite Copper unit with immediate effect and disconnected electricity supply to the plant.
The TNPCB said that during inspections by its officials on May 18 and 19, it was found that the unit was carrying out activities to resume its production operations though permission was not granted.

Munjal-Burman group agrees to re-open bidding, Fortis board undecided

Fortis Healthcare on Sunday said the Munjals-Burmans combine, whose bid for investing Rs 18 billion was approved by its board, have consented to re-opening the bidding process.
In a regulatory filing Fortis Healthcare said it has received a letter from Hero Enterprise Investment Office and Burman family Officer...giving their consent to re-open the bidding process to enable the company to move ahead with the fund-raising transaction.

In a letter to the board of directors, Munjals-Burmans combine expressed "deep anguish and regret" and said "it appears that there may be indecision on the part of the company regarding the bid process, which we understand could be on account of a few shareholders indicating their preference to the company for re-open of the bid process".
Fortis Healthcare, however, did not clarify whether it will re-open the bidding process.
When contacted, a Fortis spokesperson said the company's board will take a decision on whether the bidding should be re-opened or not, without specifying when the meeting would take place.
"Necessary intimation to the regulator and stock exchanges would be given accordingly," he said.
Fortis' board of directors is scheduled to meet on May 30 to consider and approve the audited financial results for the quarter and financial year ended March 31, 2018.
Last week, Fortis board was reconstituted after its shareholders had voted out its director, Brian Tempest, from the board in the extraordinary general meeting (EGM) held on May 22.
Earlier, out of four directors whose removals were sought by two institutional investors, three directors - Harpal Singh, Sabina Vaisoha and Tejinder Singh Shergill - had resigned ahead of an EGM called to vote on the matter.
The resignations of three directors and removal of Tempest has cast a shadow over the ongoing attempt to sell Fortis as these four directors were among the five who had voted in favour of Munjals-Burmans combine's Rs 18-bn bid for the healthcare firm.

Insolvency resolution: Binani CoC votes in favour of UltraTech's proposal

The Committee of Creditors (CoC) of Binani Cement on Monday voted in favour of the Rs 79.60 billion offer from UltraTech Cement for the takeover of the aforesaid company currently undergoing insolvency proceedings.
Sources attending the meeting said that since UltraTech is taking care of all the legitimate claims of all the stakeholders, its proposal received 100 per cent consent.

As the next step, the CoC will submit its plan to the resolution professional and in turn, the offer will be submitted to the NCLT.
"No Letter of Intent needs to be issued and hence the proposal can be submitted directly to NCLT", a lender said.
The lenders met in Mumbai and voting in person took place. One of the leading lenders had earlier asked the CoC to be physically present at the venue for the voting process.
Sources in the CoC, who participated in the voting said that it overrides its previous decision when it selected the offer from the Dalmia Bharat led consortium as the successful bidder. Hence, as per this decision, UltraTech becomes the H1 bidder thereby replacing Rajputana Properties - the Dalmia Bharat led consortium.
In the previous instance, after the CoC had approved Dalmia Bharat's proposal and placed the proposal to the Kolkata bench of NCLT, UltraTech and several other stakeholders contested it. In turn, the Tribunal had ordered the CoC to consider the Aditya Birla Group company's proposal and select a resolution plan for submission latest by June 24.
Sources in Dalmia Bharat said that in case the NCLT approves the offer from UltraTech, it will contest the decision in the Appellate Tribunal and may also move the Supreme Court.
On the other hand, on the same day, the Supreme Court has admitted Dalmia Bharat led consortium's allegation that UltraTech is ineligible to bid under Section 29(A) of the IBC. The hearing on the matter is slated early next week.
Lenders who passed UltraTech's plan and had claimed it to be eligible, thereby refuting Dalmia Bharat's claim said that despite the CoC reaching a decision on the bidder, they will abide by the decision of the Supreme Court.
Lenders opined that the Tribunal had directed while passing the order, that its actions need to be in accordance with the spirit of the IBC. The Tribunal had also held that the objective of the IBC is maximisation of value.
"It is clear from the order that one who is offering the highest amount will be selected as the H1 bidder. We had asked Dalmia Bharat to match the offer from UltraTech but they didn't within the stipulated time", a lender said.
Even as the Dalmia Bharat led consortium has moved the Supreme Court alleging UltraTech Cement to be disqualified to bid for the stressed assets of Binani Cement, the Rs 79.60 billion proposal from UltraTech will be put to vote on Monday by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) of Binani Cement.
Asked about the voting on Monday, one of the leading lenders said, “There is a hearing on this case on June 4 and by then we feel that a successful bidder had to be selected”.

Sunday, 27 May 2018

EU regulator calls the end of diesel in several years, puts faith in e-cars

Consumers may do as much as regulators to propel the car sector into the electricity-powered age foreseen by Tesla Inc., according to the European Union’s industrial-policy chief.
European Commissioner Elzbieta Bienkowska said the EU has had a “breakthrough moment” since Germany-based Volkswagen AG admitted in 2015 that it fitted diesel engines with software to cheat US checks on smog-causing discharges of nitrogen oxides. This deeply affected “the emotions in society toward emissions and cleaner cars,” she said.

Brexit spurs EU banks to trim UK assets “Diesel cars are finished,” Bienkowska said in a May 24 interview in her ninth floor Brussels office. “I think in several years they will completely disappear. This is the technology of the past.”
The auto-emissions scandal may help the EU gear up for a technological revolution in road transport. Europe is seeking to retain leadership in the worldwide market for passenger cars in the face of competition from the US., where Tesla is based, and China, which accounts for about half of electric-vehicle sales.
Tighter Rules
VW’s cheating, which the U.S. uncovered and led Germany to order an EU-wide recall of 8.5 million Volkswagen vehicles, pushed the world’s No. 1 carmaker into a crisis and left policy makers in Europe scrambling to patch up regulatory holes that threatened a “clean-diesel” strategy dating to the 1990s. Bienkowska’s services were subsequently notified of possible engine-management irregularities in more diesel cars, including some made by Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV.
The issue has been politically thorny in Europe because around half the cars in the region are powered by diesel -- which causes more urban pollution than gasoline while having less global-warming impact -- and because many member states have struggled to meet clean-air goals meant to reduce human sicknesses and premature deaths.
“People have realized that we will never have completely clean -- without NOx -- diesel cars,” said Bienkowska, who comes from Poland.
Last week, EU governments backed a revamp of the rules for authorizing car models in the 28-nation bloc. The European Commission, the EU’s regulatory arm, won the power to fine automakers up to 30,000 euros ($35,157) per faulty car and order recalls as part of the more centralized market oversight, becoming more like the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Carmaker ‘Arrogance’
Bienkowska said “arrogance” by carmakers, coupled with their traditionally close ties to national governments, meant the draft law was initially greeted as if the industry wrongdoing had been insignificant. Gradually, she said, attitudes changed.
“I am really a little bit less frustrated than I was a year ago,” said Bienkowska. “During this denial phase, it was awful.”
Adding to the optimism is an initiative by the commission and industry to spur the development in Europe of batteries for electric cars, including through financing. European companies seeking to get a foothold in the market include BMW AG, Daimler AG, BASF SE and Vattenfall AB.
“We want to have the first batteries produced in Europe, but also the whole value chain,” Bienkowska said. “It’s the kind of a project that a single member state cannot afford.”
Individual European companies are doing their part too.
VW, which aims to sell as many as 3 million all-electric cars annually by 2025, has awarded 40 billion euros in contracts to battery producers. The deals take the company to within striking distance of its target to lock down 50 billion euros in supplies.
European electric-vehicle sales, now about 1.5 percent of all new registrations on the continent, will rise to about 5 percent in 2021 and take off from 2025, according to Bloomberg New Energy Finance.
European Incentives
EU policy to fight climate change may also play a role, albeit in a more nuanced way than China’s approach of imposing quotas. A draft European law to tighten caps on car discharges of carbon dioxide offers incentives for automakers to shift to electric vehicles.
In the meantime, Bienkowska must continue to tackle the haziness and headaches of the diesel age. She’s stepping up legal threats against several EU countries, including Germany and Italy, for lax enforcement of the previously agreed European rules meant to ensure carmakers heed NOx limits.
Bienkowska is also urging a number of EU nations, particularly in eastern Europe, to increase recalls of vehicles suspected of failing to meet NOx standards. At present, eight member countries have mandatory recalls in place.
“We have member states like Romania, Slovakia and Poland where the recall rate is extremely low,” she said. “We don’t want those parts of Europe to be full of old diesel cars.”

Watch and learn before mordernising IT prospect: Nasscom's Chairman Premji

Industries, enterprises and their leaders today do not have the "luxury" of time to wait and learn before modernising IT landscapes for being ready for the future, Nasscom Chairman Rishad Premji said, stressing that modernisation is not just about technologies like artificial intelligence and blockchain but also about change management and talent.
"With an eye on the unpredictable future, I would humbly submit to you that we don't have the luxury of time to wait, watch and learn before modernising our own IT landscapes to be future ready, Premji said addressing the NASSCOM C-Summit here.

He said the pace of the modernisation journey is dictated by the shifting landscape of technology and ecosystems but the choice to act is ours. This in many way is the leadership challenge of today."
"Technology is no longer enabler to business strategy, I think technology is the new business strategy, he said at the May 24 summit.
The day-long Nasscom (National Association of Software and Services Companies) C-Summit focussed on the theme of digital innovation and brought together executives, industry leaders and analysts who talked about digital innovation and transformation and how new technologies such as Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain, Internet of Things and Augmented Reality are transforming work and customer experience.
Premji, who was in April this year appointed as Nasscom Chairman for 2018-19, said the modernisation agenda is not only about technologies such as cloud, Application Programme Interface (API), Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain but it is as much about culture, change management, about fundamentally revisiting the ways of working and about talent.
Premji, Chief Strategy Officer and Member of the Board at Indian IT services giant Wipro, said digitalisation is still very much in its early stages of scaling but there is significantly more maturity in the way companies and industries are addressing it.
We have learnt that beyond the latest technology, the fundamental economics have changed. Business models are being and will continue to be disrupted and industries will blur boundaries. But irrespective of the strategy, the fundamentals of putting the customer first and at the centre of every conversation will not change, he said.
He pointed out that new technologies powered by more organised data and the focus on behavioural design would make it possible for other stakeholders to stake claim on one's customers.
The good news is that if you can impactfully leverage this data and technology to truly know and understand your customers, the opportunity to grow is limitless, he said.

Why India has become deadliest country in the world for forest rangers

On February 20, 2017, range forest officer (RFO) Daulat Ram Lader was having his ritual after-dinner tea with wife Pushpa when there was a knock at the door. Lader was posted at Lailunga, Dharamjaigarh forest division, in Chhattisgarh’s Raigarh district.
Lader opened the door and stepped out to speak with the visitors. An hour later, his body, hacked to death, was found some 40 yards from his home, just across the local police thana (outpost).

A month before, Lader had seized a tractor carrying illegally mined stones from the Kelo river, a tributary of Mahanadi that flows through the Lailunga reserve forest. It belonged to one Dilo Kumar.
“Kumar had repeatedly threatened Lader over the past month,” said sub-divisional officer Chakrapani Sharma. “(But) Lader dabang type ka tha (he was fearless).” He was known to be an upright officer who never bent to political pressure.
Lader’s murder was not an isolated incident. India is currently the most dangerous country in the world for forest rangers. In 2017, 29 rangers were killed on duty in India; the Democratic Republic of Congo (17) and Thailand (8) made for a distant second and third, as per a report of the the International Ranger Federation.
Between 2012-17, India accounted for nearly 31%–162 of 526–ranger deaths, according to the federation. Besides being the highest globally, this is just one less than the sum of deaths of the next five countries on the list–Congo, Thailand, Kenya, USA and South Africa.
India recorded most deaths (34) in 2012 and 2016, and the least (19) in 2013.
Frontline forest staff in India are increasingly targeted by poachers, illegal miners, timber smugglers and encroachers while protecting forests, wildlife, rivers, wetlands and other natural ecosystems and resources.
Why the work that rangers do is critical
The work that rangers do is critical to India’s ecological and economic security. The forests they protect, for instance, absorb 11.25% of India’s greenhouse gases, according to a ministry of environment and forests (MoEF) report. The value of what is technically called an “ecosystem service” would amount to Rs 6 lakh crore ($120 billion).
Yet, our investigations across India showed, rangers work with outdated equipment, no emergency medical assistance, few support or safety systems and little recognition of the hazards they face everyday.
As recently as May 15, 2018, forest guards were manhandled and injured when they tried to stop illegal fishing in Kaziranga National Park.
The period between 2011-2014 saw the death of 72 forest rangers in India. “India has one of the highest rates of ranger deaths in the world,” Sean Willmore, president, International Ranger Federation and founder-director, The Thin Green Line Foundation, told IndiaSpend over email.
‘Rangers’ includes the uniformed service, or the frontline staff of the forest department, the authority mandated to protect India’s forests and wildlife.
One of the hazards of working in forests is accidental death by wild animals. A recent example was S Manikandan, field director at the Nagarahole Tiger Reserve, who was accidentally killed by an elephant while trying to douse forest fires on March 3, 2018, World Wildlife Day.
The number of deaths is conservative because they rely on regional ranger associations for reporting deaths. It is unlikely to include daily wagers who form the bulk of the frontline staff but are not on any official employee list.
Why are rangers singled out for attack?
The answer lies in the fact that they protect India’s forest which covers about 20%–the figures are disputed–of its terrestrial area and the natural resources they contain: Wildlife, wood, timber, minerals, sand, stones and boulders. All these are becoming increasingly rare and precious.
The rocks seized by Lader were not worth much–no more than Rs 20,000–but they feed an illegal multi-crore trade in minor minerals. Rocks are crushed into gravel chips or gitti for use in the construction industry and road building.
Conservationist Meetu Gupta, who has been working in Chhattisgarh for 18 years, said that hundreds of illegal stone crushers operate in and around Dharamjaigarh and Raigarh. They are backed by the local mafia and politicians, she alleged.
“Though the extraction of ‘minor minerals’ like sand and gravel/boulders is regulated by central and state laws as well as court judgments, illegal extraction and markets thrive,” said Gupta. “The region is seeing massive road and railway expansion to transport coal, and the contractors prefer to buy ‘black’ as it’s cheaper.”
‘Our forests are an open treasury, open to loot’
Ravindra Singh Jachpele of the Maharashtra forest department is another forgotten hero. He paid with his life for protecting the Gondia forests that form a critical corridor between Navegaon-Nagzira (Maharashtra) and Kanha (Madhya Pradesh) tiger reserves. It is also one of the last remaining tracts of original teak forests of the central Indian highlands.
While on routine patrol on May 20, 2017, Jachpele noticed illegal felling of trees in the corridor and booked the offenders. He was murdered a few days later. The men who cut the trees are now murder suspects.
“Our forests are an open treasury, easy to loot,” said Bittu Sahgal, Sanctuary Asia Editor and founder of Sanctuary Nature Foundation. “While we love our tigers, few realise the effort, and sacrifice that goes into protecting them.”
Safeguarding the endangered red sanders tree is another risky task. Valued as basic material for musical instruments crafted in southeast and west Asia, it can fetch over Rs 2 crore ($293,900) a tonne in the black market. Three forest staffers were stoned and hacked to death for trying to stop the smuggling in the erstwhile Andhra Pradesh in 2013.
In Kalwa forest division, Navi Mumbai, encroachment cost forest guard Budhaji Jadhav his life on July 14, 2014. Illegal encroachment, including for real estate, industry and agriculture, is the single biggest driver of forest destruction: 1.89 million hectares of forest land–that’s 18,900 sq km or roughly five times the size of Goa–have been encroached upon, according to data revealed by former environment minister Prakash Javadekar in Parliament in April 2016.
If encroachment is destroying forests, illegal wildlife trade is driving species to extinction. Wildlife crimes are ranked alongside trafficking in arms and drugs in terms of profits, and fetch between $8-10 billion annually, as per the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.
Nandini Velho, a researcher who has put in many years in Pakke Tiger reserve, Arunachal Pradesh, narrated the story of forest guard PD Majhi: “He was instrumental in starting off anti-poaching efforts in Pakke, and was shot dead in an encounter with poachers in April 2007. In park director Tana Tapi’s words, ‘It was like we lost a colonel, only he died battling for Pakke.’”
In Odisha, attacks by armed poachers in Kuldiha Wildlife Sanctuary on May 2, 2018, prompted divisional forest officer Biswaraj Panda to seek police protection for his personnel. This wasn’t the first time, Panda told IndiaSpend: “Over the past month, nine forest staff have been injured in two separate incidents.” Kuldiha is an important wildlife area abutting the Similipal Tiger Reserve.
The dangers of challenging sand miners
The war over sand is particularly ruthless worldwide, but nowhere is it “more ferocious than in India”, said this March 2015 report in Wired.
To feed its construction boom, India digs 500 million metric tons of sand–the main ingredient of concrete–every year, and that’s only what is legally recorded. There are no official figures for the amount of sand mined illegally, but in 2015-16 more than 19,000 cases of illegal mining of minor minerals, which includes sand, gravel and stones, were registered.
The cost of this demand for sand is felt by those who try to stop illegal sand mining from rivers nationwide.
During a visit to the National Chambal Wildlife Sanctuary in March 2016, news came in that forest guard Narendra Sharma was mowed down by sand miners illegally operating in the sanctuary in Gwalior district, Madhya Pradesh. In February 2018, Indian Forest Service officer Abhishek Tomar was attacked by the sand mafia in Madhya Pradesh’s Chhattarpur district, the Times of India reported on February 9, 2018. When Tomar intercepted a tractor trolley carrying sand, they tried to run him over and shoot him, the report said. Fortunately, he survived.
“Sand mining could turn out to be one of the biggest ecological disasters in recent times,” said Kanchi Kohli, researcher, Centre for Policy Research, a think tank. “The environment ministry’s 2016 guidelines to regulate sand mining clearly acknowledge that excessive extraction is having a major impact on rivers, deltas, coastal and marine systems, resulting in loss of land, coastal erosion and lowering of groundwater tables, all of which are hazardous to the riverine ecosystem.”
The extraction of sand also leads to collapse of river banks and beaches which is particularly fatal to species that nest here. The loss of such nesting sites is leading to extinction of the gharial, an ancient crocodilian species, of which fewer than 1,000 survive in the wild.
Most rangers have faced life-threatening situations
Those on the frontline of the forest wars live a tense life. Threats are constant. The staff at Deori chowki, Morena (Madhya Pradesh), manning the Chambal river banks, talked about the terror of the sand mafia. Retaliation is inevitable when there is an attempt to stop dumpers from ravaging the sand bank.
Lader was a “soft target as he had fearlessly cracked down on the illegal smuggling of wood, coal, sand and stones under his watch”, his colleagues said. Records accessed from the Chhattisgarh government show that seizures done by Lader yielded a revenue of Rs 9.65 crore ($1.41 million) to the state between 2012-17.
“Threats in the course of work are not uncommon, but we tend not to let these weigh us down,” said Sunil Bachchan, Lader’s batchmate and RFO in the adjoining Bilaspur district. But he admitted to be being shaken by Lader’s murder.
No less than 63% rangers have faced life-threatening situations, according to a 2016 survey by the Worldwide Fund for Nature (WWF) and Rangers Foundation Asia (RFA), both NGOs. The survey also revealed that more than 20% rangers felt threatened by local communities.
Protected areas are restricted for anthropogenic activities such as grazing, wood-cutting and collection of minor forest produce which can lead to confrontations with criminal elements engaged in commercial extraction and local residents who live off the land.
These confrontations often mean that the staff are at odds with their own community. Members of the Human-Elephant Conflict Mitigation Squad tasked with tracking elephants in Athgarh (Odisha), for instance, talked of dealing with the resentment of villagers, sometimes even their own families, for protecting animals that damaged crops.
In instances of human-wildlife conflict like these, traumatised villagers sometimes turn on the forest staff and the animals. One such incident was reported from Kalagarh part in the Corbett Tiger Reserve, where villagers set a caged leopard aflame in March 2011. Though the cat had been captured, it was doused with kerosene and set ablaze. Kerosene was also poured on the staff to prevent them from rescuing the leopard.
Globally, 2-3 rangers die on duty every week
Around the world, the number and intensity of environmental conflict is growing. The murder of environment defenders–local people, journalists, conservationists, scientists–by those seeking to exploit natural resources is also becoming a global trend.
Rangers are on the frontlines of this battle. Two to three rangers lose their lives every week on frontline duty, over 1,000 have been killed in the last decade, Sean Willmore wrote in The Guardian in December 2016. Nearly 70% were murdered by poachers, prompting the International Union for Conservation of Nature to call for tough measures against wildlife crime.
Rangers are especially vulnerable in Africa, where the slaughter of wildlife is relentless. Virunga National Park, the finest habitat for the last of the world’s 800 mountain gorillas in the Democratic Republic of Congo, is ranked one of the most dangerous conservation projects in the world. A number of armed rebel groups operate in and around the park. It also faces serious threats from poachers and illegal timber smugglers.
Over the past two decades, 175 rangers have been killed in Virunga National Park. Most recently, on May 11, 2018, ranger Rachel Katumwa was killed by gunmen when she tried to shield British tourists who were kidnapped.
In tropical forests across Asia–particularly Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, Cambodia–illegal logging and clearing of forests for palm oil are lethal businesses.
In Pakistan, forester Mohamad Akram was decapitated by illegal loggers when he refused to accept a bribe to let them continue their “job”.
Little recognition of the dangers rangers face
Though they are constantly targeted and killed, forest rangers operate in a void: Field investigations over the years show that there is little recognition and no honour accorded to the job. There isn’t even provision for essential equipment or training. Three in four staff surveyed across Asia by the Rangers Federation said they were not supplied with proper equipment and amenities to ensure their safety. Nearly half–48%–had not received adequate training for the job.
Conversations with forest staff and officials show that in India too they are poorly equipped and not empowered to deal with the threats they face every day. They are rarely armed and when they are, their antique .12 bores and .303 rifles are neither reliable nor useful. If there are vehicles and boats for patrolling, for instance, there isn’t enough fuel to run them. Often, contract workers do not get their wages on time. Funds are delayed or not appropriately allocated.
As a member of the National Board for Wildlife, this writer had submitted an agenda for staff welfare to the MoEF during a meeting on June 6, 2013. It highlighted the challenges routinely faced by rangers: Working in remote, isolated areas with poor communication facilities and no immediate medical assistance in case of an emergency.
In this meeting, it was also stated that staff shortages average about 30% across India. In some reserves like Palamu in Jharkhand, it has hovered around 90% over the last decade and improved only recently.
The consequences of such shortages can be catastrophic. In Lalgarh, south Bengal, in March 2017, two employees monitoring a tiger fell asleep in their vehicle and suffocated to death. With only 40% manpower and a tiger in an inhabited area, “many put in long hours of work, leading to such a horrific tragedy”, Ravi Kant Sinha, the chief wildlife warden of West Bengal, told IndiaSpend. “We lost our best men.”
Little state support, but that can change
India does not stand by its forest rangers even in death.
In case of an injury or death, forest authorities usually pitch in to help the family or provide medical assistance. They are assisted by contributions from Ranger Associations, NGOs and individuals. NGOs, such as the WWF-India and Wildlife Trust of India, provide insurance schemes and assistance for frontline forest staff. Some parks–Kaziranga (Assam), Periyar (Kerala), Kanha (MP) and Annamalai in Tamil Nadu–have taken life and medical insurance initiatives for their staff. Tiger reserves offer a small incentive for field staff.
But there is no “institutional pan-India life or health insurance schemes for frontline forest staff”, admitted Sanjay Pathak, deputy inspector general with the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA). Tiger reserves are encouraged to make such provisions in their annual plans, which can be financed by NTCA, he said.
Recognising these threats, the MoEF had constituted a committee for the welfare of frontline forest staff, at the suggestion of the National Board for Wildlife in September 2013. In a meeting on December 2013–in which this correspondent participated–a policy was proposed to govern ranger recruitment, posting and promotion and consider welfare measures, such as housing and medical facilities, insurance schemes, rationalisation of duty hours and hardship allowance.
Four years since, officials admitted there had been “no movement forward”.
There is another important element missing: Motivation, support and appreciation from society. Some park managements, usually aided by NGOs, have stepped up to motivate their staff–with awards for courage, exemplary dedication etc.
Pakke Tiger Reserve has taken this a step further with a public voting contest for “best camera trap images” to help motivate field staff. In the most awaited evening in the Pakke calendar, senior officials, staff, researchers and locals get together, dine and play sports. Awards are handed out to deserving staff–a small step in making rangers forget their deadly reality.

Moon, Kim discuss scrapped summit as Donald Trump signals optimism

The leaders of North and South Korea met for two hours on Saturday to discuss the canceled summit with Donald Trump, less than a day after the U.S. leader signaled the meeting may be back on citing “very productive” talks between the two countries.
South Korea’s Moon Jae-in and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, in a surprise move, spent two hours together at the truce village of Panmunjom, and had a candid discussion about the potential U.S.-Korea meeting, Moon’s office said in text message. Moon will brief the media on the unexpected meeting at 10 a.m. Sunday, his office said.
Trump on Friday night said the historic June summit with Kim could go ahead following talks between the two countries.
“We are having very productive talks with North Korea about reinstating the Summit which, if it does happen, will likely remain in Singapore on the same date, June 12th, and, if necessary, will be extended beyond that date,” Trump said in a tweet.
Moon crossed the border to meet Kim at the Tongilgak building in an area of Panmunjom controlled by North Korea. They discussed how to implement the Panmunjom Declaration and the success of a potential Trump-Kim meeting, according to the text from the president’s office.
Trump abruptly canceled the planned summit in a letter to Kim on Thursday -- and then pivoted a day later. “We are talking to them now,” he told reporters in Washington earlier Friday, saying the summit might proceed and “it could even be the 12th.”
State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert told reporters in Annapolis, Maryland, on Friday, that “we are working on plans going forward.” While there are always “high points and low points” in diplomacy, she said, “we hope that the meeting will go forward at some point.”
The comments reflected a broadly shared perception inside the White House and State Department that the two leaders still want to get together and there will be a meeting eventually. “We would like to do it,” Trump said, and “they very much like to do it.”
Less than a year after the two leaders traded threats of nuclear war, the back-and-forth over whether the summit will even happen reflects both Trump’s lead-from-the-gut style of decision-making and North Korea’s long-standing penchant for unpredictable behavior.
US Claims Successes
U.S. officials argue that the administration has already won a great deal from North Korea, including a moratorium on missile testing and the release of three American prisoners, without giving up anything in return. A White House-led advance team is heading to Singapore this weekend as previously planned to deal with the logistics of a potential summit, Politico reported.
But the latest developments also exemplified how quickly aspirations for successful talks between North Korea and the U.S. -- which remain technically at war -- can rise and fall.
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told a Senate committee on Thursday that U.S. negotiators had been getting only “dial tones” when they tried calling their North Korean counterparts in recent days, which coincided with increasingly sharp rhetoric from Pyongyang about U.S. intentions. Trump cited North Korea’s “tremendous anger and open hostility” as his reason for canceling the summit.
At the same time, it also was increasingly clear that the administration’s goal of “total denuclearization” of the Korean peninsula was interpreted differently in North Korea, which analysts say is unlikely to give up all of its nuclear capabilities and especially not in short order, as the U.S. has demanded.
“We weren’t getting the right signals previously, so hopefully we will in the future,” Nauert said. “We didn’t want to go to a meeting just for the sake of going to a meeting. There had to be something to come out of it.”
‘Everyone Plays Games’
Trump appeared to take the turbulence in stride. Asked Friday if North Korea was playing games ahead of the summit, the president responded, “Everyone plays games.”
Although he trumpeted America’s “massive and powerful” nuclear arsenal in his letter canceling the summit, Trump also thanked Kim for the release of the detainees, described the “wonderful dialogue” they were developing and left open the door for reconciliation. North Korea responded in kind, with First Vice Foreign Minister Kim Kye Gwan saying that his country still wanted to pursue peace and said it would give Washington time to reconsider talks.
“The first meeting would not solve all, but solving even one at a time in a phased way would make the relations get better rather than making them get worse,” First Vice Foreign Minister Kim said in a statement carried Friday by the state-run Korean Central News Agency. “We would like to make known to the U.S. side once again that we have the intent to sit with the U.S. side to solve problem regardless of ways at any time.”
According to a person familiar with the administration’s thinking, Trump’s letter was intended only to convey his decision against going ahead with the summit on June 12 -- not to rule out a meeting in the future. The person, who asked not to be identified discussing internal matters, said the “maximum pressure” campaign to strangle North Korea’s economy is working, and Kim’s regime will have to come to the table eventually.
China’s Vice President Wang Qishan found encouragement in the continuing exchanges between the U.S. and North Korea.
“Both sides still leave some maneuver for a discussion,” Wang said Friday on a panel at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum in Russia. “So I’m confident that peace and security on the Korean peninsula can be maintained. And it’s between North Korea and the U.S. right now. And a summit is needed to achieve a breakthrough.”
At the Pentagon, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis said Friday that “the diplomats are still at work on the summit” but declined to say whether he thought the event would take place on June 12. He did say that the leaders of the two nations have had positive interactions. “I’ll let them talk all they want and then I’ll hope and pray the diplomats pull it off,” he said.