Showing posts with label Gautam. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gautam. Show all posts

Sunday, 15 December 2019

CG Power fraud: Thapar cites board approvals, denies fund misuse charges

Citing regular board approvals for various inter-corporate loans, former CG Power Industrial Solutions' non-executive chairman GautamThapar has refuted allegations of fund misuse amid alleged governance lapses coming under the regulatory scanner, according to documents submitted by him to the government.
In a 36-page submission to the corporate affairs ministry early November, Thapar, who was sacked in a boardroom coup in the wee hours of August 30, has provided documents on various issues, including inter-corporate loans, minutes of board meetings and loans from lenders like Standard Chartered Singapore and Yes Bank.
CG Power board sacked Thapar after an audit report by Vaish Associates, which itself is based on as many as 23 disclaimers, claimed that Thapar swindled Rs 3,000 crore from CG Power.
Markets regulator Sebi banned Thapar and entities associated with him for three years, following which he moved the Securities Appellate Tribunal, which has asked the company to provide relevant documents to him.
The Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) has also started a probe against CG Power and 15 group entities. The ministry has moved NCLT Mumbai seeking to restate the books of accounts of CG Power from FY16. An order is expected on Monday.
The documents, seen by PTI, show how Standard Chartered Singapore extended a $44-million lifeline to CG Singapore in February 14, 2018. The entire money was then paid to CG International Netherlands through another group entity AIA and Avantha. The same amount was fully transferred back to CG International Netherlands on the very same day.
Later, the company in turn paid back the entire amount to StanC Singapore, thus making the account standard, show the documents.
While a major allegation revolves around funds moving in and out of CG Power and group entities, Thapar has claimed that such a route was taken following suggestions from lenders since CG Power was facing liquidity issues.
Similarly, Aditya Birla Finance and Yes Bank allowed CG Power to get funds between 2016 and 2019 in a similar manner as StanC did in 2018, showed the documents.
"All the above transactions were done according to the structure provided by StanC and other respective lenders and every time the entire money was paid back to the respective lender. That not a single penny of such funds remained in Avantha books clearly shows that there is no siphoning of funds," Thapar has claimed.
Going by the documents, the company's risk and audit committee at its meeting held on May 26, 2017 gave an "omnibus approval for entering into transactions with related parties for throughout FY18". Similar omnibus approvals were sought for and were granted for FY19 as well.
Further, Thapar has submitted that the board approved a proposal from CG India on September 28, 2018 for a fixed deposit of Rs 229 crore as part of a credit line from IndusInd Bank. This deposit was a surety for part payments owed to Avantha towards brand royalty which the board approved, according to the documents.
"This clearly shows that Rs 229 crore was not an additional advance to Avantha but a refund of a conditional deposit made by Avantha to CG which had to be refunded in the event of conditions not being met," the document said.
On the allegations that CG Power made out-of-turn advances to group entity Mirabelle Trading since 2013 when CG Power was entering Southeast Asia, Thapar has said the board approved an advance payment of $20.15 million to Mirabelle towards service charges.
Currently, Thapar owns just 8,574 shares in CG Power. Some of its large non-promoter shareholders are HDFC Mutual Fund and Aditya Birla Mutual Fund.
Private equity giant KKR India led by Sanjay Nayar owns nearly 10 per cent, as does L&T Finance. The family office of Sunil Bharati Mittal of Bharti Airtel has since September picked up 8.3 per cent in CG Power.
The CG Power board began to feel the tremors this March, when an operations committee was formed under chairmanship Narayan Seshadri following the insistence of Nayar.
Incidentally, the documents also showed that Seshadri was not even present at the board meeting that appointed him as chairman of operations committee. Seshadri is also an independent director of CG Power.
Significantly, Seshadri's Tranzmute Capital is 50 per cent owned by Nayar but this was never disclosed to CG Power when he came onto the board, as per the the documents.
They are also directors in Epimoney and EPI Venture Partners as investors. Also, a non-disclosure agreement was signed between Tranzmute Capital & Management and CG Power in August 2018.
Going by the documents, Seshadri had a business relationship with Nayar and CG Power before he became a non-executive director on CG Power board.
It is also interesting to note that Anubhav -- son of Akhil Gupta, who is the vice chairman of Bharti Enterprises and a close confidante of group Chairman Sunil Bharti Mittal -- recently married Sanjay Nayar's daughter Adwaita.
In a detailed e-mail statement to queries from PTI, KKR India denied any involvement in Seshadri being appointed a director on CG Power board. "We are a lender to Avantha Holdings and have no locus standi in any of its underlying group companies. KKR India has never been involved in the decision-making process of CG Power," it said.
The statement said that KKR is aware that SeshadrI was invited directly by Thapar himself to join the board.
"We confirm that Narayan's partnership with KKR India was fully disclosed (on March 31, 2018). Tranzmute has working relationships with other PE funds, promoters and companies, including KKR India - there has never been exclusivity between KKR and Tranzmute in this regard," it said.
On relationship with Epimoney, the company said KKR has never been an investor in it but Nayar is one of its six investors.

Saturday, 12 October 2019

Focus on self-regulation at meet to discuss digital content players

The issue of online and digital content is a real challenge, and requires closer interaction between stakeholders before a standardised system of self-regulation can be developed, said Justice Gautam Patel on Friday, the concluding day of a seminar held in Mumbai on film certification and regulation of online content.

The session, organised by the Ministry of Information & Broadcasting in partnership with the Film Certification Appellate Tribunal (FCAT), took place on Thursday and Friday. More than 100 stakeholders from the media and entertainment industry participated.


A conversation between all parties will lead to the evolution of a structured, common, discernible, and standardised system of self-regulation, Justice Patel said, according to a statement from the ministry.

In January, the online content platforms, also called over-the-top (OTT) service providers, agreed to a “Code of Best Practices for Online Curated Content Providers”. The code had been criticised for being very vague at the time.

At least nine OTT players, including Netflix, Hotstar, Zee5, and ALT Balaji, had pledged to adopt the model code, or a set of best practices for content regulation, which was put together by industry body Internet and Mobile Association of India (IAMAI). Other signatories included Viacom18, Arre, Eros Now, Sony Pictures Networks, and Jio Digital Life.

“It was a discussion in the right direction. The fact that the OTT industry generates massive peripheral employment was also recognised. Most participants stressed on the need for the industry to be more responsible, and that censorship would not be an optimum solution,” said a person who attended the seminar.

People in the know said the industry was working on creating a body that can be used for escalation of complaints regarding OTT platforms. However, industry is divided on having such a body, as they equate this with censorship.

Retired Chief Justice Manmohan Sarin, chairman of the Film Certification Appellate Tribunal (FCAT), said industry players had to work on self-regulation themselves. He said certifying authorities should focus on certification guidelines, without getting carried away by their personal bias, views, and prejudices.

According to media reports, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh met representatives from Netflix and Amazon Prime Video, to ask them to restrict “anti-national” and “anti-Hindu” content on their shows.

A statement from the ministry said several participants raised questions on the technical feasibility of regulating the huge amount of online curated content, and the framework to be adopted for enforcing such regulations.

Similar seminars are likely to be held, with more stakeholders, in other cities such as Kolkata and Chennai. The Ministry of I&B will begin talking to individual content streaming companies from next week, according to people in the know.