India vs New Zealand 2nd ODI Live score: KL Rahul departs as India lose 4th

In the second match of three-match One Day International series, MartinGuptill and Ross Taylor smashed half-centuries to power New Zealand cricket team to a competitive 273 for eight at Eden Park Auckland today. Put in to bat, Guptill scored a run-a-ball 79 and alongwith his opening partner Herny Nicholls (41) shared a 93-run partnership but the hosts suffered a collapse, losing five wickets for 26 runs to slip to 197 for 8 at one stage.
Yuzvendra Chahal (3/58) claimed three wickets, Shardul Thakur (2/60) took two wickets, while Ravindra Jadeja (1/35) snapped one and effected a run-out to put the hosts in a spot of bother in the middle but Ross Taylor's brilliance saw them post a good score. Taylor, who had scored a century in the first ODI, played a unbeaten knock of 73 off 74 balls and added 76 runs with debutant Kyle Jamieson (25 not out) to take New Zealand across the 250-mark.
Earlier, India cricket team made two changes, bringing in Navdeep Saini and Yuzvendra Chahal in place of Mohammed Shami and Kuldeep Yadav. New Zealand, on the other hand, handed ODI debut to Kyle Jamieson, the country's tallest bowler standing at six feet, eight inches. He replaced spinner Ish Sodhi, while Mark Chapman came in for Mitchell Santner in the playing XI.
Here are the playing 11 of both the teams:
India playing 11: Prithvi Shaw, Mayank Agarwal, Virat Kohli (c), Shreyas Iyer, Lokesh Rahul (wk), Kedar Jadhav, Ravindra Jadeja, Shardul Thakur, Navdeep Saini, Yuzvendra Chahal, Jasprit Bumrah
New Zealand playing 11: Martin Guptill, Henry Nicholls, Tom Blundell, Ross Taylor, Tom Latham (c & wk), Mark Chapman, James Neesham, Colin de Grandhomme, Kyle Jamieson, Tim Southee, Hamish Bennett

India vs New Zealand 2nd ODI live score


India vs New Zealand 2nd ODI live streaming details

The India vs New Zealand 2nd ODI match will be telecast live on Star Sports 1 and Star Sports 1 HD with English commentary. The same broadcast with Hindi commentary will be available on Star Sports 1 Hindi and Star Sports 1 Hindi HD. You could also watch live streaming of the match on the Hotstar website and app. The live telecast will also be available in Tamil, Telugu, Kannada and Bangla on the respective regional-language channels of Star Sports 1 from 7:30 am (IST).

Stay tuned for India vs New Zealand live score, final playing 11, toss updates and match commentary…
CATCH ALL THE LIVE UPDATES
Auto Refresh
01:10 PM
Over 18
Over Summary: 1 0 4 0 0 0 | IND: 83/4

Ball 6 de Grandhomme to Jadhav, no run

Ball 5 de Grandhomme to Jadhav, no run

Ball 4 de Grandhomme to Jadhav, no run

Ball 3 de Grandhomme to Jadhav, FOUR!! Slapped straight but the ball went towards md-on

Ball 2 de Grandhomme to Jadhav, no run

Ball 1 de Grandhomme to Shreyas, single
01:06 PM
Over 17
Over Summary: 0 1 1 0 0 0 | IND: 78/4

Ball 6 Neesham to Jadhav, no run

Ball 5 Neesham to Jadhav, no run

Ball 4 Neesham to Jadhav, no run

Ball 3 Neesham to Shreyas, single

Ball 2 Neesham to Jadhav, single

Ball 1 Neesham to Jadhav, no run
01:02 PM
Over 16
Over Summary: 0 1 0 0 0 0 | IND: 76/4

Ball 6 de Grandhomme to Shreyas, no run

Ball 5 de Grandhomme to Shreyas, no run

Ball 4 de Grandhomme to Shreyas, no run

Ball 3 de Grandhomme to Shreyas, no run

Ball 2 de Grandhomme to Jadhav, single

Ball 1 de Grandhomme to Jadhav, no run
12:56 PM
Over 15
Over Summary: 0 0 4 0 0 0 | IND: 75/4

Ball 6 Jamieson to Shreyas, no run

Ball 5 Jamieson to Shreyas, no run

Ball 4 Jamieson to Shreyas, no run

Ball 3 Jamieson to Shreyas, FOUR!!

Ball 2 Jamieson to Shreyas, no run

Ball 1 Jamieson to Shreyas, no run
12:52 PM
Over 14 KL Rahul bowled
Over Summary: 0 W 0 0 0 0 | IND: 71/4

Ball 6 de Grandhomme to Jadhav, no run

Ball 5 de Grandhomme to Jadhav, no run

Ball 4 de Grandhomme to Jadhav, no run

Ball 3 de Grandhomme to Jadhav, no run, yorker length delivery

Ball 2 de Grandhomme to KL Rahul, OUT!! Rahul looks to cut but it's not the ball to go for that, he regrets as the bowler rises to the occasion

Ball 1 de Grandhomme to KL Rahul, no run
12:46 PM
Colin de Grandhomme into the attack
12:45 PM
Over 13
Over Summary: 1 0 0 1 0 0 | IND: 71/3

Ball 6 Jamieson to Shreyas, no run

Ball 5 Jamieson to Shreyas, no run

Ball 4 Jamieson to KL Rahul, single

Ball 3 Jamieson to KL Rahul, no run

Ball 2 Jamieson to KL Rahul, no run

Ball 1 Jamieson to Shreyas, single
12:41 PM
Over 12
Over Summary:1 0 0 4 0 1 | IND: 69/3

Ball 6 Southee to Shreyas, single to the covers

Ball 5 Southee to Shreyas, no run

Ball 4 Southee to Shreyas, FOUR!! Places it to long off beautifully

Ball 3 Southee to Shreyas, no run

Ball 2 Southee to Shreyas, no run

Ball 1 Southee to Rahul, 1 run
12:37 PM
Over 11
Over Summary: 0 0 4 0 0 0 | IND: 63/3

Ball 6 Jamieson to Shreyas, no run

Ball 5 Jamieson to Shreyas, no run

Ball 4 Jamieson to Shreyas, no run

Ball 3 Jamieson to Shreyas, FOUR!!

Ball 2 Jamieson to Shreyas, no run

Ball 1 Jamieson to Shreyas, no run
12:33 PM
Over 10 Kohli bowled
Over Summary: 0 1 1 W 2 0 | IND: 59/3

Ball 6 Southee to KL Rahul, no run

Ball 5 Southee to KL Rahul, two runs

Ball 4 Southee to Kohli, BOWLED!! Well placed yorker and Kohli is back to the pavilion.

Ball 3 Southee to Shreyas, single

Ball 2 Southee to Kohli, single

Ball 1 Southee to Kohli, no run, appeal for LBW but Kohli survives
12:26 PM
Over 9
Over Summary: 1 1 1 0 4 1 | IND: 55/2

Ball 6 Jamieson to Kohli, single to third man

Ball 5 Jamieson to Kohli, FOUR!! Pulled quickly to over mid-wicket for a boundary

Ball 4 Jamieson to Kohli, cover drive but no runs off it

Ball 3 Jamieson to Shreyas, single to third man

Ball 2 Jamieson to Kohli, single to third man

Ball 1 Jamieson to Shreyas, single to third man, slight edge there

Older people need rides, but what's stopping them from using Uber and Lyft?

Martin Gerstell treasures his Thursday morning volunteer stint at the National Gallery of Art, where he fields questions at the main information desk. He patiently responds when visitors ask about the current exhibits, whether the paintings are real, where the bathrooms are.
Usually, fellow volunteers give him a ride from his assisted living residence in northwest Washington to the museum downtown, and home again. But when they can’t, Mr. Gerstell, 94, uses the Uber app his granddaughter installed on his iPhone.

“They appear very quickly, and they’re very helpful,” Mr. Gerstell said of his Uber drivers, who fold and stash his walker in the trunk. Summoning a taxi, his previous option, usually took 15 to 20 minutes; Uber arrives in three to five minutes and charges less, under $20, to drive him downtown.
It probably helps that Mr. Gerstell, a retired electrical engineer, handles new technology with aplomb.
Donna Nettleton has encountered a different reaction at the Oasis Institute in Shiloh, Ill., where she volunteers to teach older people about digital devices.
Her students take happily to Facebook, but “Uber and Lyft are scarier because they involve money,” she explained. Older adults, warned continually about scams and identity theft, fear that misusing an app could empty their bank accounts.
“It’s challenging to build the confidence they need to actually use these things that could make life easier for them,” Ms. Nettleton said. So far, she’s been unable to convert any of her advisees — including her 80-year-old mother — into riders.
More than half of adults over 65 own smartphones, the Pew Research Center has reported. Yet among adults 50 and older, only about a quarter used ride-hailing services in 2018 (a leap, however, from 7 percent in 2015). By comparison, half of those aged 18 to 29 had used them.
In a survey by AARP last year, only 29 percent of those over 50 had used ride-hailing apps. Two-thirds said they weren’t likely to do so in the coming year, citing in part concerns about safety and privacy. (Given data breaches at Uber, that’s no baseless fear.)
Nevertheless, transportation experts see ride-hailing as a way to improve mobility and preserve independence for older people who can or should no longer drive, or never did.
Ride-hailing — and, one day, autonomous vehicles — are game-changers, said David Lindeman, who directs health programs at the Center for Information Technology Research in the Interest of Society at the University of California, Berkeley. “We have wonderful new opportunities that many people are still not aware of.”
One reason for such optimism: evidence that with personalized instruction, older adults can master the mobile apps and take “networked transportation” to medical appointments, entertainment and leisure activities, social visits and fitness classes.
In a newly published study, researchers at the University of Southern California offered three free months of unlimited Lyft rides to 150 older people in and around Los Angeles (average age: 72) who had chronic diseases and reported transportation problems.
With training, nearly all used Lyft, most through the mobile app (a few used a call-in service), for an average of 69 trips. On follow-up questionnaires, almost all riders reported improved quality of life.
But ride-hailing companies aren’t waiting around for more older adults to grow adept with their phones.
Seniors in need of transportation constitute a potentially lucrative market. So Lyft and Uber and others are contracting with third parties, bypassing the need for older riders to use apps or to have smartphones at all.
They’re joining forces with health care systems, for instance.
In the past 18 months, more than 1,000 — including MedStar, in the Washington area, and the Boston Medical Center — have signed on with Uber Health for “nonemergency medical transportation,” the company said.
Case managers and social workers can use Uber or Lyft to ferry patients to or from clinics and offices, reducing missed appointments.
“Hospitals may spend millions on taxi vouchers,” said Dan Trigub, who heads Uber Health. “Uber is cheaper, and we see higher patient satisfaction.”
The companies have targeted senior living facilities, too. Most provide some sort of scheduled transportation, primarily for medical visits, but often “the residents feel limited by the shuttle — it doesn’t really provide the independence they want,” said Gyre Renwick, vice president of Lyft Business.
Now, at Brookdale Senior Living, the nation’s largest chain, as well as several other chains and communities, the front desk staff can call Lyft for residents, either billing the resident or rolling the cost into the monthly fee.
Both major ride-hail companies are also experimenting with programs for older and disabled people whose mobility problems make standard curb-to-curb services difficult to use.
The Lyft and Uber apps can dispatch wheelchair-accessible vans in several cities. In 20 cities, Uber Assist trains drivers to provide extra help for people using canes, walkers and folding wheelchairs, though riders must still be able to enter and leave the car on their own.
In the Bay Area, though, frail older people can get “door-through-door” services from 12-year-old SilverRide. Its trained, vetted drivers escort riders out of their homes, help them transfer into and out of the car, and then accompany them to their specific destinations.
“Door-to-door takes you to the entrance to the hospital,” said Jeff Maltz, a co-founder of the service. “We’ll take you all the way to the doctor’s office.” SilverRide has pilot programs underway in Sacramento, Los Angeles and Kansas City, Mo., Mr. Maltz said, and will expand further next year.
Another smaller player, GoGo Grandparent, piggybacks on Uber and Lyft, hiring operators who can take riders’ requests on standard telephones, via push button menu, or by voice. The operators arrange the trip, charging 27 cents a minute over the ride-hailing fees. (Of course, family members can dispatch Uber and Lyft to pick up their older relatives as well, for no extra cost.)
That raises a key question: Will ride-hailing be too expensive for many seniors? In the U. S. C. study, the typical trip cost $22; the cost per month, had users actually paid it, averaged $500. After the study, about a fifth of riders said they wouldn’t continue using ride-hailing, mostly because of cost.
Some Medicare Advantage programs now cover rides to medical appointments and pharmacies; Lyft expects to partner with most Advantage plans by next year, Mr. Renwick said. But most older Americans still use traditional Medicare, which doesn’t cover such transportation.
Experts like Alexandre Bayen, director of the Institute of Transportation Studies at the University of California, Berkeley, also worry about ride-hailing outside metropolitan areas. “The rural population might not see this for a long time,” he said. He envisions a combination of new public policies, subsidies and public-private partnerships to make ride-hailing broadly available.
One might wonder, too, about health organizations, local governments and senior communities outsourcing transit to two companies that continue to lose money and, critics warn, may prove financially unsustainable. The companies have been sued by disability advocates and by their own drivers.
Still, “it’s got great potential,” Joseph Coughlin, director of the M. I. T. AgeLab, said of ride-hailing. “There’s been so painfully little innovation in transportation for the aging population that anything we do can only be an improvement.”
The New York Times Service