Showing posts with label NHAI. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NHAI. Show all posts

Friday, 30 August 2019

NHAI at a crossroads on debt servicing; 'concerned' PMO raises red flags

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) finds itself in a spot over its deep financial stress, prompting the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) to raise the red flag over its “unplanned and excessive expansion”. Even before the PMO’s intervention, there were signals that alerted the government to sit up and take notice.
The reluctance of lenders to fund highways built on the hybrid-annuity model (HAM), where the government itself pumps in equity to the tune of 40 per cent of the project cost, and the authority’s reliance on the EPC (engineering, procurement and construction) model for constructing roads have burdened the NHAI’s finances. EPC projects are fully funded by the exchequer.
According to SBI Caps, the proportion of debt funding has risen sharply in the recent NHAI projects. “At the same time, toll collection has grown at a very modest pace of 6 per cent for a km (from Rs 55 lakh a km in FY13 to Rs 80 lakh in March 2019).

Hence, revenue collection barely covers the interest servicing cost of these projects, let alone project returns. Thus, there is rising concern over debt servicing,” the report said.
The NHAI, sources familiar with the developments said, has become excessively leveraged with its debt, which is expected to touch Rs 2.5 trillion by the end of the current financial year. While government support has marginally fallen by Rs 36,691 crore over last year, borrowings are expected to rise by about 21 per cent to Rs 72,000 crore this year.
The NHAI’s payment outgo on account of interest is expected to be about Rs 25,000 crore annually for the next two decades or so.
Rating agency ICRA has estimated the NHAI’s contingent liabilities at Rs 63,000 crore, but this may be a gross underestimate. Experts such as former NHAI chairman Brijeshwar Singh has said in television interviews that the actual contingent liability may be five-times more at Rs 3 trillion.
ALSO READ: CAG raises concerns over burgeoning costs of NHAI's projects, cautions govt
“A 20-year financial plan for the NHAI was finalised in 2013-14, which included budgetary support from the government, and borrowing and repayment of loans. It is revisited every year and is upgraded wherever needed. The borrowings of the NHAI have increased because of reduction of funds from cess collection for road construction,” former road secretary Vijay Chhibber said.
The debt pressure comes at a time when land acquisition cost has also risen. The NHAI’s expenditure on land nearly doubled to Rs 32,143 crore in 2017-18 from Rs 17,824 crore in 2016-17, according to the latest NHAI data. “The rise in land acquisition and civil construction costs, investment (EPC and HAM projects) are turning financially unviable/unsustainable, necessitating reforms,” said SBI Caps.
Though the increase in land acquisition cost is also due to more projects being taken up, there has been a rise in compensation amount for the land owners after the new Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

ALSO READ: New speed breaker on India's road to $ 5 trn economy; NHAI's mounting debt
The NHAI is also likely to double its borrowings from the National Small Savings Fund (NSSF) this year and raise about Rs 40,000 crore from the NSSF in 2019-20 as part of its massive Rs 75,000-crore borrowing plan for the year. It plans to raise a similar sum in the coming years to meet the construction of national highways and expressways. The NHAI raised Rs 20,000 crore from the small savings scheme in FY19.
Prior to that, in 2017-18, the agency raised Rs 6,657 crore by way of issue of capital gains tax exemption bonds, Rs 40,875 crore from the domestic market, the EPFO, LIC, NSSF loan and Rs 3,000 crore through issuance of masala bonds from the international markets. Its income from toll collection, revenue share and premium that companies pay instead of taking grant and interest was Rs 8,840.754 crore.
Added to the NHAI’s burden are the annuity payments from the earlier BOT (annuity) contracts, which are paid every six months over a period of 12 to 18 years from the dates of completion of the projects. These amount to around Rs 47,946 crore till March 31, 2018.
"Until FY2014, the mode of project award was determined based on the waterfall mechanism that explored BOT (Toll) first followed by BOT (HAM) and then EPC, depending on the traffic density along the project stretch. This process slowed down the awards due to weak private sector participation," ICRA said in its report.
The report said the risk sharing was not balanced in the current BOT (Toll) model. Therefore, it is time to devise a new model on the lines of BOT (HAM) to reduce the upfront equity contribution for private developers to an extent.
While the government and the NHAI are trying to fix the road construction model, experts believe it is the sale of road assets that requires greater attention. According to Chibber, the road monetisation drive should fetch the government at least Rs 30,000 crore every year. However, it has only been able to raise Rs 9,000 crore through the toll-operate-transfer (TOT) model,” he added.

Saturday, 11 May 2019

NHAI tweaks strategy for Rs 3 trillion projects under Bharatmala scheme

High land acquisition costs have forced the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) to tweak its strategy for project implementation. The NHAI has decided to consider only those projects that require minimal land acquisition as it finalises highway contracts worth about Rs 3 trillion under the Bharatmala scheme.
Reprioritising its execution strategy, the Authority will change the weight it gives to different factors while planning projects. Earlier, freight movement and revenue from projects were given precedence over land acquisition. This essentially means existing projects that need expansion may get priority over new ones.

“This will help in getting a better fix on viability. Projects that have financial viability will be considered,” a senior NHAI official said, adding these projects were part of the broader Bharatmala scheme.
Asked whether the other factors (freight and revenue) would be overlooked, the official said those aspects would not be ignored but the land component would be given more weight.
The reason for shifting priority is land compensation costs, which increased after the new Act — the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (LARR) — came into being in January 2014. Before the Act, the land acquisition cost made up 10 per cent of a project’s cost. This has now risen to 30-40 per cent.
The Ministry of Road Transport and Highways and the NHAI are ready with a list of projects that would be awarded as soon as the new government takes office. The land acquisition and other regulatory approvals for these projects, totalling a length of 6,500 km, under the Bharatmala scheme are complete, an official said. He did not divulge more details about these projects.
The ministry set a target of constructing at least 12,000 km of national highways in 2018-19, as against 9,829 km achieved during 2017-18.
chart According to the latest official data, 5,759 km has been completed (till November 2018) in 2018-19.
In October 2017, the Union Cabinet cleared the Bharatmala project to construct highways connecting the length and breadth of the country at an estimated investment of Rs 7 trillion. These corridors have been conceptualised to permit faster movement of cargo vehicles.
The first leg of the project is expected to cost Rs 5.5 trillion and would be funded through various sources, including Rs 2.09 trillion from the market, Rs 1.06 trillion through private investment and Rs 2.19 trillion from the central road fund or toll collection.
The NHAI plans to raise Rs 10,000 crore through Bharatmala Taxable Bonds in 2019-20. Under Phase 1 of the Bharatmala Pariyojana, the government has approved the implementation of 24,800 km of highways and 10,000 km of balance National Highways Development Projects over five years — from 2017-18 to 2021-22. The total length of projects under Bharatmala is 65,000 km.
The overall market borrowing for the Bharatmala project is estimated at ~2.09 trillion till 2021-22. The project was first mooted in April 2015 and aims to connect Gujarat and Rajasthan, then move to Punjab and cover Jammu & Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand followed by Uttar Pradesh and Bihar and further to Sikkim, Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, right up to the Indo-Myanmar border in Manipur and Mizoram.

Saturday, 10 November 2018

NHAI to focus on executing contracts where all clearances are in place

Tightening its fist on project financing, the road ministry, which aims to construct 30 per cent more roads each day this year, will focus on executing contracts where all requisite clearances are in place. Now, its construction wing — the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) — is focusing on judiciously planning its expenditure for the current financial year.
The length of highways completed by the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, the NHAI and the National Highways & Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited (NHIDCL) in 2017-18 was 9,829 km, or roughly 27 km per day.

“This year we would construct 15,000 km or 30 per cent more roads per day than what we did last year,” a senior official said.
Union Road Minister Nitin Gadkari had earlier said the daily day road construction target for the current financial year (2018-19) is 45 km. However, the internal target of the ministry is about 35 km per day by the end of this year, an official said, requesting anonymity.
The move is aimed at judiciously planning the expenditure by the central government, the NHAI and the NHIDCL. “Since the NHAI has to borrow money, we only want to invest in the projects that will give returns. We will also focus on completing the pending projects,” an NHAI official said.
chart The NHAI's borrowings during the current year are Rs 620 billion. In August, the authority tied up loan worth Rs 250 billion with the State Bank of India.
ALSO READ: Lenders, not NHAI have first right to IL&FS' sold highway projects
Experts believe that this is a step in the right direction as project implementation is faster once the necessary clearances are in place. “The approach would ensure that the financial costs incurred can derive economic benefits in the shortest time possible,” said Kushal Kumar Singh, partner, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India LLP.
Citing an example, Singh said the Jaipur-Kishengarh six-lane project was executed in 24 months because the land acquisition for the contract was in place.
ALSO READ: NHAI arbitrations galore: Companies should consider other cash flow options
Even as there is nearly a 30 per cent increase in the per day per kilometre of road construction target for the fiscal, in terms of lane kilometers, the target remains 94 km lane per day by the end of this year. A lane-km is defined as a kilometre-long segment of a road that is a single lane in width. For example, a 1-km stretch of a standard two-lane road represents two lane-kilometre).

Friday, 20 July 2018

NHAI set to change road monetisation offer due to low traffic fears

Facing the prospect of low traffic volumes on some of its upcoming highways owing to parallel projects, the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) has tweaked the second bundle of contracts to be offered under the toll-operate-transfer (TOT) model.
The stretches that were found saturated in terms of traffic volumes will now be replaced with those earmarked for the third tranche of bidding.

Two to three highway contracts, earlier selected for the third round, will be offered under the second round of TOT bidding. One such project lies between Bengaluru and Hyderabad on the north-south road corridor. It already has traffic of 35,000 PCUs (passenger car units a day).
According to two officials with direct knowledge of the matter, this was done because the bundle of contracts selected earlier runs parallel to the existing national or state highways (shadow projects), reducing their attractiveness for prospective international investors.
“They feel it would be best not to invest in such projects due to the risk in terms of toll revenue involved,” a senior NHAI official told Business Standard.
Shadow stretches are roads that run parallel to the highways planned for monetisation. These have a bearing on the volume of traffic, resulting in lower toll collection. The Union government is hopeful of raising Rs 69-70 billion from the second tranche of road monetisation, comprising six to seven highway stretches cutting across Odisha, West Bengal, Telangana and Tamil Nadu.
According to a road sector expert, changing the offered projects between tranches does not make a difference to the investors if the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways and the NHAI maintain the size of the total contract on offer between $800 million-$1 billion (Rs 55.2-69 billion).
ALSO READ: Road monetisation model to be adopted for inland waterways project
In February, Australia-based Macquarie group, in partnership with Ashoka Buildcon, bagged a Rs 96.8 billion TOT contract for nine national highways with a total length of about 700 km.
Funds generated from monetisation of highways will be used for new infrastructure programmes, and the government expects to raise around Rs 2 trillion through TOT in the next five years.
The Cabinet in 2016 had authorised the NHAI to monetise 75 public-funded national highway projects using the TOT model, which was developed to encourage private participation in the highways sector.
Under the TOT model, the concessionaire pays one-time concession fee upfront (lump sum), which then enables the concessionaire to operate and toll the project stretch for the predetermined 30-year concession period.
What’s the worry
Bharatmala, an umbrella programme for the highways sector that focuses on optimising efficiency of traffic movement, may put existing road projects at risk, according to an ICRA report
Bharatmala projects may lower traffic on existing projects and increase disputes
The risk of traffic diversion is assessed on the basis of traffic mix, long-distance traffic and key feeder routes
28% projects face moderate to high risk of traffic diversion
Stretches under Bharatmala are either longer by more than 20% or traverses a new route completely