As part of the regulatory package for dealing with the fallout of the Covid-19 pandemic on Indian financial markets, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) announced today that “the time is apposite to remove the segmentation between the onshore and offshore markets” and accordingly it has been decided to permit banks in India which operate International Financial Services Centre (IFSC) banking units or IBUs, to participate in the non-deliverable forwards (NDF) market from June 1, 2020 through their branches in India, foreign branches or through their IBUs.
The provocation for this move is no doubt the recent large capital outflows from the markets that caused huge volatility in the forex markets – offshore NDF and onshore rupee. The volatility, widened spreads and drop in liquidity were more pronounced in the NDF markets and spilt over to the local forex market. If Indian banks were allowed to operate in the offshore markets, it would have perhaps have been possible to stem the volatility in the NDF market and the spillover effect - this could also have also facilitated more effective RBI intervention.
RBI
The RBI Task Force (August 2019) that studied the NDF markets extensively discussed the suggestion made to it to permit Indian banks to deal in the offshore market. The arguments made were: removing segmentation between onshore and offshore markets would improve liquidity and price discovery; there would be better customer pricing through increased transparency in the offshore market; there would be better access to information for local authorities and there would be a level playing field with overseas banks who freely deal in NDF markets. While the merits of the arguments were appreciated, the downside risk was that participation of Indian banks in NDF will improve liquidity in the NDF market and undermine the development of the onshore market. Also, completely removing the segmentation between the offshore and onshore markets would militate against the capital control measures in place; hence it felt that the measures to bring the NDF market onshore should precede allowing Indian banks to participate in NDF market.
Hence, while it is perhaps apposite to remove some segmentation between offshore and onshore markets to allow the Indian banks to effectively participate in the NDF markets to stem the volatility there and spillover effects to onshore markets, there is a need to have separate limits on the positions the banks can take in the NDF market within the overall position limit. This is comparable to the regulation that foreign banks operating in the local markets are not allowed to take off-setting positions (in their overseas branches) in the NDF markets.
Former RBI deputy governor Usha Thorat had chaired the task force on offshore rupee markets, which had come out with its recommendations in August 2019
The provocation for this move is no doubt the recent large capital outflows from the markets that caused huge volatility in the forex markets – offshore NDF and onshore rupee. The volatility, widened spreads and drop in liquidity were more pronounced in the NDF markets and spilt over to the local forex market. If Indian banks were allowed to operate in the offshore markets, it would have perhaps have been possible to stem the volatility in the NDF market and the spillover effect - this could also have also facilitated more effective RBI intervention.
RBI
The RBI Task Force (August 2019) that studied the NDF markets extensively discussed the suggestion made to it to permit Indian banks to deal in the offshore market. The arguments made were: removing segmentation between onshore and offshore markets would improve liquidity and price discovery; there would be better customer pricing through increased transparency in the offshore market; there would be better access to information for local authorities and there would be a level playing field with overseas banks who freely deal in NDF markets. While the merits of the arguments were appreciated, the downside risk was that participation of Indian banks in NDF will improve liquidity in the NDF market and undermine the development of the onshore market. Also, completely removing the segmentation between the offshore and onshore markets would militate against the capital control measures in place; hence it felt that the measures to bring the NDF market onshore should precede allowing Indian banks to participate in NDF market.
Hence, while it is perhaps apposite to remove some segmentation between offshore and onshore markets to allow the Indian banks to effectively participate in the NDF markets to stem the volatility there and spillover effects to onshore markets, there is a need to have separate limits on the positions the banks can take in the NDF market within the overall position limit. This is comparable to the regulation that foreign banks operating in the local markets are not allowed to take off-setting positions (in their overseas branches) in the NDF markets.
Former RBI deputy governor Usha Thorat had chaired the task force on offshore rupee markets, which had come out with its recommendations in August 2019
No comments:
Post a Comment